At Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:20:31 -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > Matthew Flatt wrote: > > Just pushed: > > > > old new notes > > ----------- --------- ------------------------------- > > .mzschemerc .racketrc even `mzscheme' uses ".racketrc" > > .mredrc .gracketrc even `mred' uses ".gracketrc" > > ~/.plt-scheme ~/.racket Unix user-specific dir > > ..../PLT Scheme ..../Racket Windows & Mac OS user-specific dir > > plt-prefs.ss racket-prefs.rkt Unix & Windows pref file > > org.plt-scheme.prefs.ss Mac pref file > > ^ > > org.racket-lang.prefs.rkt > > etc. > > How about using a different suffix for "data in S-expression form" such > as the prefs files. I interpret an .rkt suffix as indicating an > executable program. > > Or the suffix could be dropped entirely.
Yes, I think that removing the suffixes is a good idea. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
