On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > >> How about using a different suffix for "data in S-expression form" such >> as the prefs files. I interpret an .rkt suffix as indicating an >> executable program. >> >> Or the suffix could be dropped entirely. > > Yes, I think that removing the suffixes is a good idea.
Removing the suffixes makes them un-double-clickable in explorer/finder/nautilus. I would find that very annoying. How about a .sexp suffix for non-executable, but READ-able file? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
