Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> writes: > But those commits are very important to me -- and the though of > considering preserving that history vs apologizing for 5 emails > instead of one seems like a very bad idea.
The *e-mail* is the least problem in this case: Your five individual commits go on the permanent record. If I'm not mistaken, the "push history" isn't even preserved by git after the e-mail was sent - there's only the commit history. Right? > I'm sure that those 86 commits are important for *Sam* -- but as far > as *I'm* concerned it's all a big blurry "stuff happened in typed > scheme" If they're truly only important to Sam, they should live in Sam's repository, not in everyone's. The whole point of a distributed SCM is that this kind of thing is actually manageable, and pretty easily so. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
