On May 17, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Michael Sperber wrote: > I didn't say they're only important to Sam - Eli said this.
Yes, understood. I didn't mean that as directed towards you; I only wanted to ensure that I was on the record as saying that I'd prefer people did _not_ start squashing things willy-nilly, except where it makes sense. > I only said that *if* X is about to push N (where N >> 1) changes and > *X* thinks only the composition of those changes matters for everyone > else, then X should push a single composed patch. I totally agree with > the rest of what you said - especially "easily digestible", which the > current push e-mails are not. Yep. To officially weigh in on this side of things, I have been in the "don't care" camp, though I do sympathize with your concern here. I used to read, or at least skim, all the SVN commits (I got both trunk and branch commits via email). However, I have been much more lax about doing it recently because it's more work. Given that, I think I'm moving over towards the "separate emails" camp. Stevie_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
