On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > On May 25, David Van Horn wrote: >> Could the following make its way into unstable/list? It adds remf >> for symmetry with findf and memf. > > Is there any reason for putting it in unstable? It should not be used > outside of the racket tree.
I agree - I can't imagine that the interface to `remf' is likely to change. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
