On May 26, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
> > On May 25, David Van Horn wrote:
> >> Could the following make its way into unstable/list? It adds
> >> remf for symmetry with findf and memf.
> >
> > Is there any reason for putting it in unstable? It should not be
> > used outside of the racket tree.
>
> I agree - I can't imagine that the interface to `remf' is likely to
> change.
I missed the fact that this is removing only the first matching item
rather than all of them (which would make it the same as
`filter-not'). Are there any cases where this is useful?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
