>> It does have a LEVEL definition which corresponds to the compression > level argument for gzip, and I tried to tweak that to see what > happens. To my surprise, I discovered a bug that I introduced a long > time ago -- which made it do almost no compression (or maybe none at > all). But the result still had valid format so it wasn't discovered. > > I fixed that, and made some other minor improvements [...]
That's great news! I'll grab the code and check it out. Many thanks, -- Dave
