On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:42 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > It does have a LEVEL definition which corresponds to the compression > level argument for gzip, and I tried to tweak that to see what > happens. To my surprise, I discovered a bug that I introduced a long > time ago -- which made it do almost no compression (or maybe none at > all). But the result still had valid format so it wasn't discovered.
It sounds to me like one could formulate a test suite for this program: -- create correct format -- compress some file by a well-known factor. Did you add this to the test suite? -- Matthias
