On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Grant Rettke <grettke at acm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote: >> On Feb 19, Robby Findler wrote: >>> I think Eli's asking 'why not do (log-info (format "~s" >>> my-sexp))?'. Right? >> >> [Uh, yeah, but that looks so much boring...] > > Is (log-info-sexpr ...) less boring? >
It is such a short macro; do we really need to add 3 more exports to scheme/base for that? Robby
