On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Neil Van Dyke <neil at neilvandyke.org> wrote:
> I've found logging as sexps to be somewhat more convenient than strings, at > least for debugging info. > > However, I'd want the formatting of sexps to strings to be done > immediately, not asynchronously, lest values change in the meantime and > compromise my debug info. > > Hi Neil, can you elaborate a bit more on how would sexp and string differ in this case? Assuming your sexp contains only immutable objects, I am sure how the value (and assuming you are refering to the sexp itself) would change. Thanks, yc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/archive/dev/attachments/20090219/a3604aac/attachment.html>
