> http://foo.bar.com/bletch.html#tag > but there's no "tag" in bletch.html) is handled is to point the link > to the beginning of the page which presumably would have contained the > link (in the above example, to paragraph 0 of bletch.html). [...] > change the parser to treat such URLs as excluded, just as with any > other URL which doesn't exist.
I have to support the other message which said that we should support current (bad) practice, rather than taking a hardline on semantic bugs. I'm all for excluding browser-specific features, but using the page instead of avoiding it for a missing id is probably arguably in the spirit of the spec, if not the letter. -- MJR
