-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> I agree this is annoying. I don't know why BBC, CBC and The Onion all
> insist on this for their otherwise very well designed mobile sites.

        I wouldn't exactly call them "well designed". I took some time
yesterday to clean the Onion's site, take out the illegal and improper tags
and attributes, added proper inline CSS, and still shaved 1k off the size of
the main page. I'm going to email them my ideas/changes. It looks identical,
but validates, is smaller, faster, and more compliant.

> and use the strategy of modern desktop browsers use to flick on a switch
> of "use my stylesheet to override" so can override all the annoyances/bugs
> of people's choices for tags, colors, etc.

        Adding an inline CSS element to home.html or a custom_css = my.css
type of key for plucker.ini would really be an interesting approach. It
would almost overlap most of what Sitescooper can do with "linting" the
remote site's HTML. As a user of Plucker I like it. As a developer of parts
of it, I dread supporting this, but I like it.



d.

perldoc -qa.j | perl -lpe '($_)=m("(.*)")'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.1.92 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9lD9ekRQERnB1rkoRAt+UAJwJ5gycKQvzx5hm7f1xY3/MUrSO/QCePxKe
DHolIfT5hMF7npe38WnE6fE=
=oXGp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev

Reply via email to