Blake Winton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You say that as if it's an either/or choice. If Eugene wants > to work on making plucker more robust, who are we to stop him? [...]
Oh yes, plucker's Free Software, so if any new developer wants to concentrate on that, then go ahead. I just didn't want anyone having illusions about the difficulty. Tidy is not a new project and still is nowhere near fixing 100% of the crap out there. It's already possible to use tidy before plucker, so I also wonder how "itchy" the task is. I agree that calling tidy as a filter is probably the right way to do it with the least effort. I'd be disappointed if existing (very busy, as far as I can tell) developers stopped working on the wonderful things we're seeing and started with that, though. Just my opinion as a counterweight to the original request, that's all. On the point from lower down the thread: emailing webmasters of dud pages is probably worth an option. I don't really believe in options, but that would be a useful trick, but you wouldn't always want to do it. -- MJR http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is my home web site. This for Jabber Messaging. How's my writing? Let me know via any of my contact details. _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
