As long as it's cross-platform I'm all for a new parser. -Kjp On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 15:50, Edward Rayl wrote: > > > > > >I realize that most of the time more options is better, however, I think > >when users have too many options they can get confused (okay, maybe just MS > >users) and not want to even try it out. Also, more options means > >developers spend less time helping each others code out and more time with > >their own specific code. > > > I certainly would not get confused, but there is a matter of spending > the time as a beta tester. Right now, JPluck is the slickest solution > I've seen. So much so, that I am not spending any time on other > parsers. The ability to apply XSLT, changeable user agents, cookies > support, superior speed, etc. makes JPluck my default choice. I'm > actually surprised that deploying Java on end user machines is an issue > for you or your company since it is so easy. In any case, my two cents > is that time is the big issue. > > Ed > > > _______________________________________________ > plucker-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list -- Kevin J Poorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
