On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:49:35PM -0500, Mark wrote: > The new version has fewer font options, was it four? I know there are seven > choices in the old version. The reason this is important is that in Palm OS > 4 (I have no idea what OS 5 looks like), having lots of font options allows > me to pick a little-used font (normally LargeBold) and remap it with > FontHack, but leave the "normal" fonts alone in case FontHack messes up a > page. The new version reduces or eliminates my chances to pick an 'unused' > font to do this with. Was there a reason for the fewer fonts?
Well, I guess it was a bit of an experimentation on my part. Part of it was done becuase some more room was needed on that form for some upcoming features, also my thinking was that the extra fonts were redundant (obviously not taking into account your unique handling of the fonts via a hack) Alex Pruss has some good ideas about adding on user-definable fonts, and his solution might actually act as a workaround to your problem. Ofcourse, this hasn't yet been included in any official releases yet. The 1.4beta1-hires should still have the same interface on that form. -- Adam McDaniel Array.org Calgary, AB, Canada _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
