On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 18:40 +0800, Rogelio Serrano wrote: > On 7/9/06, Johann Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 10:01 +0800, GOvvin wrote: > > > Re pushing for "plain linux and not a specific distro". That isn't > > > also possible. Discrimination against proprietary sofwtare pa din yun > > > > Given that Windows has like 90% of the desktop OS market, a little > > "discrimination" won't hurt much. If Microsoft wants to be competitive > > in third-world countries, they should re-evaluate their pricing and > > anti-piracy measures. > > > > _________________________________________________ > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > > > > I wonder how many of those are licensed. Is 100% compliance even enforceable? > > OT, sorry. > > Well what about those things that did not pass government standards? > is that discrimination? > That's not discrimination... that's just simply not passing to standards. That happens everytime.
> What if the government required that all software it uses are all patented? There are no software patents here in this nation. -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
