On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Zak B. Elep <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Winelfred G. Pasamba
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> but why maintain an evil-associated name for a good software?
>> and why do we have to explain these historical excuses to all our students
>> in operating systems every semester?
>
> I think its actually easier to remember the term `daemon' rather than
> something like `terminate and stay-resident programs'. :D
>
> Besides, when said daemons don't work as expected, you wouldn't
> probably call them using good terms, now, would you? XD
>

The way I remember 'daemon' is, it is a program or job that
I or anyone can't see that runs around like demons in the
background (or dark). It slips in quickly when needed to do a task
and slips out quickly when the task is done. This is happening with
no body like us humans ever aware or noticing.


> --
> Zak B. Elep  ||  zakame.net
> 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1  F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to