On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:09 AM, fooler mail <[email protected]> wrote: > just compile waste.c without gcc optimization (eg. gcc waste.c -o > waste) and make sure that during the sampling of clock speed time is > more than 1 second to get a better results...
Thanks, that made the difference :) I was compiling the lazy way (e.g. `make -k waste') which passed in `-O2 -pipe'. I'm curious as to why there's a difference though; I suppose the compiler optimized away the empty for(), among other things... -- Zak B. Elep || zakame.net 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
