On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:43 PM, fooler mail <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Zak Elep <[email protected]> wrote: >> I suppose the compiler optimized away >> the empty for(), among other things... > > yup.. gcc will remove those doing nothing codes for optimization... in > this case the for() loop... im aware of this and thats the reason i > didnt use the -O argument.. i really thought there was a bug on the > openbsd scheduler or its gcc package and thats why i was eager to > install openbsd this morning and look for it :->
Turns out there's a bug in the user, lol :P I was spoiled by bsd.prog.mk and `make -k'. Thanks again, this is very instructive (though it leave me to wonder how you have a lot of spare time to go through all this. :) -- Zak B. Elep || zakame.net 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
