Orlando Andico wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, fooler wrote:
> ..
> > > Where did you get these gems? by my own measurements, FreeBSD is SLOWER
> > > overall than Linux, although more stable.
> >
> > try to tweak its runtime parameters and tune its kernel and you will
> > see the difference. linux cant outperform freebsd in all aspect in
> > terms of performance.
>
> Yes. The converse can also be said.
like can you disabled delayed acknowledgement in linux without digging or modifying
the code? i tried to tweak linux too but still the algorithms of freebsd is still
superior.
> > > The OpenBSD people would take major issue with that claim..
> >
> > unfortunately, openbsd is only good for firewalls and not for servers.
>
> it's blanket statements like this that get my goat. Have you actually USED
> openbsd extensively enough to make that claim?
yes and its not good for heavy loaded server like linux. have you heard any company
use openbsd for their busy production servers?
> I believe FreeBSD developers are after the server. No one cares for the
> desktop. And with the way they do development (too elitist, etc)
yes thats true and that is why freebsd rocks for server purposes.
> Linux will always have public sympathy. It may have Alan Cox and Linus Torvalds
> on top, but ANYONE can submit something and have a chance of it being
> included.
check this out
http://www.freebsd.org/news/press-rel-5.html
fooler.
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
