> ..
> > you have a very good point. here and to address it i believe that mysql is
> > stable enough to handle a humongous amount of concurrent user accesses
> > given sufficient hardware.
>
> Nya ha ha. Think again. Pg is a better choice for high-concurrency
> situations (the SourceForge maintainer did some tests; right now SF runs
> on MySQL, they got an order of magnitude increase in speed by moving to
> Pg). Of course in the long run.... *the O word*
>
there are some pg benchmarks out there that make pretty good sense of the
situation. but, as you have mentioned before orly it is about the "need".
in the case of IMP, pg may logically be a better solution (based on the
benchmarks.) however, if you wanna place blobs on the database then pg is
not the way to go.
--------------------------------------
William Emmanuel S. Yu
Ateneo Cervini-Eliazo Networks (ACENT)
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web : http://cersa.admu.edu.ph/
phone : 63(2)4266001-5925/5904
... and furthermore ... I don't like your trousers.
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
