On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 at 10:37, Horatio B. Bogbindero wrote:
> i have something called the "mata-mata" benchmarks. and we conclude
> that cyrus style mailboxes are much-much more efficient that classic
> mailboxes like the default /var/spool/mail. hehehe. no concrete
> benchmarks yet.
Wow! I didn't think you guys used the same benchmark software as I do.
Hehehe. I don't doubt that the Cyrus MH-like format is much more efficient
than classic mboxes. My mata-mata tests have also shown that Maildirs are
much more efficient than classic mboxes. Unfortunately I cannot conclude
anything from these in the "Cyrus vs Maildir" area. I haven't conducted
mata-mata tests to compare the two winners, either, as I don't have a
Cyrus setup.
Perhaps you could help me out?
--> Jijo
---
Linux, MS-DOS, and Windows NT ...
... also known as the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
