On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:23:17PM +0800, Manny wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Michael Chaney wrote: > > > http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?971020.eantitrust.htm > > > > By the time the courts got around to forcing them to "unbundle" it, > > Netscape was already dead. > > And as I expected, you miss the point. IE was an integral part of Win > 98/ME/2000/XP. And they had to remove it because it was seen as part of > their monopolistic activity.
You're the one who doesn't get it. Microsoft claimed it was an integral part so that they wouldn't be in violation of the consent decree. I don't know if you have the hook in you're just nuts. Michael -- Michael Darrin Chaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelchaney.com/ -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
