"Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Read it, and I agree with it: the only thing I don't get is this: > why don't they implement that in FDL 1.2? From what I've read, there > is a lot of controversy regarding this and other whatnots: "Why You > Shouldn't Use The GNU FDL" by Nathanael Nerode "Draft Debian > Position Statement About The GNU Free Documentation License
I've recently struggled with the license issue, as planner.el now comes with a rather neat mostly user-contributed texinfo file . Why are licenses so darn annoying? I inherited the planner.el project as a GPL-licensed thing, and I'm comfortable with the GPL, but figuring out the acceptable licensing for documentation sometimes seems harder than writing the documentation itself. Waaaah. >> And what might that "precious natural resource" be? > Take your pick: wetware, hardware, or software. i'm not even > counting spyware among this... I'd argue that wetware's the only thing that counts as natural, so far. ;) -- Sacha Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ateneo CS faculty geekette interests: emacs, gnu/linux, making computer science education fun http://sacha.free.net.ph/ - PGP Key ID: 0xE7FDF77C -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
