On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:19:41 -0700
"Kevin Williams" <[email protected]> dijo:

>John, what was your specific error that you got when using SSH to your
>computer? What is the local SSH server not already running?

Way too long go to remember.

>Do I understand correctly that you got the silicondust App to see the
>TV tuner on Mint and Ubuntu, but not on Debian?

Yes. On Debian the utility wouldn't even launch, with the error message
that it couldn't find the tuner. Then I discovered that I could ping the
tuner from Debian (192.168.1.112), and from Debian I was even able to
download new firmware and install it, with a command furnished by
Silicondust. But the command had a place to put the tuner's ID number,
and the command failed. When I replaced the ID number with the IP
address the command worked and the new firmware is now installed. I
worked on getting the utility to search for the IP address instead of
the ID number, but couldn't find a way to do it. I even played with the
utility's .desktop file, but without success.

>You said you wanted to move away from snap and a bunch too, and you
>didn’t like the artwork on Mint. Are you still looking to try more
>distro’s?

Maybe. Right now I want to get Debian 12 installed on the new drive.
It's installed, but I can't get it to boot. Once I solve that problem
I'll immediately see if I can get it to see the TV tuner. Everyone
blames VirtualBox for the tuner not being seen, in spite of the fact
that I found a thread on the Debian forums where over a dozen people
had the same problem, and none of them succeeded. If Debian can see the
tuner, then Debian will be my new OS. If not, then I am still distro
shopping.

>If you prefer to stick with apt-based distributions, what about MX
>Linux? It’s based on Debian, but has many papercuts worked out,
>possibly, including the one for the TV tuner.

I have heard of MX Linux, and it's on my list of possibilities. 

>If you’re willing to try an Linux distribution not based on apt, I can
>say that Fedora and OpenSUSE Tumbleweed have improved tremendously in
>usability and reliability in the last five years.
>If you’re not happy with Mint, and if MX Linux does not work with the
>TV tuner either, would you consider trying those rpm-based distros?

I ran Fedora for about two years, until I finally got tired of their
forced six month upgrades. I understand why Red Hat has that
requirement, and I respect their decision. But it's not for me. As for
others, I once briefly tried OpenSUSE, but not a lot of others. I want
a combination of cutting edge, good multimedia support, yet high
stability, a tall order for any distro. I don't find those features as
readily in RPM distros as in Debian. Plus, it takes quite a lot of
different commands and ways of doing things.

Reply via email to