On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:15 -0600, Hans Fugal wrote: > Training for programming in general. Silly or not, that is distinct from > training specifically for C/C++. Nobody would use Java to train > specifically for C++, they'd just use C++. Your assumption that C++ is > the end goal is not the only valid viewpoint.
I'm sorry I gave that impression. C++ was being used merely as one example. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
