What I want to know is whether the author of that page is going to apologize for all that bold text.
And no, I'm not going to apologize for top-posting this. On 8/3/09 15:56 , Peter Bowen wrote: > Matthew Walker wrote: >> On Wed, July 29, 2009 11:01 pm, Brian J Rogers wrote: >> >>> While you may be able to vouch for him, I cannot. I am not the one who >>> sends out these kinds of emails. To you it may have been an honest >>> mistake, but from my point of view, he sent an unsolicited email asking >>> me (what appeared to be, because I skimmed it) to sell my unused gold >>> and silver. It was spam, whether he meant to send it to me or someone >>> >> >> To clarify, it was advertising a site where you can buy gold and silver >> coins. Not that >> it matters much. >> >> > How funny, I ran across a blog last week, and this thread reminded me... > > http://blog.effectiveapology.com/2009/02/the-five-dimensions-of-effecti.html > > The pointers are pretty good. They would have helped me on past > occasions when I had to apologize. > > As to the message, my spam filter caught it, but I'm willing to forgive > - given the right apology. :) > > -Peter > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
