"David H. DeWolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/16/2005 07:27:11 PM:
> Zheng had put together an initial framework for the Admin portlets. In
> essence, the framework was as scaled down version of struts -
> specifically designed for portlets. While it was great work, I am
> personally opposed to hosting a framework (no matter how scaled down) in
> pluto, simply because I could see maintenance of the framework alone
> growing out of control quickly. Enhancement requests would role in
> simply due to the fact that others are using the framework for different
> portlets. . . .
>
> I'm curious what others thoughts are. IMHO we have 3 choices. Please
> indicate your preference:
>
> [ ] Utilize an existing framework for the admin portlet. Why rewrite?
> [ ] Roll our own framework for the admin portlet. Why not?
[X] Utilize a simple controller portlet. Simplicity is best!
I'd rather not add any other complexity to the mix including portals-bridges.
Zheng is welcome to take over control of the portlet admin app for Pluto 1.1. I'd like to contribute an interface for user management and User Information Attributes.
/Craig
- [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? David H. DeWolf
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? Zhong ZHENG
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? Santiago Gala
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? David H. DeWolf
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? CDoremus
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? David H. DeWolf
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? CDoremus
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? Zhong ZHENG
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? Raphaƫl Luta
- Re: [Vote] 1.1 Admin Portlet Framework? Santiago Gala
