sorry that I haven't followed this thread close enough. . .could someone recap on why we want to make log4j the implementation we choose? what's wrong with just using SimpleLog - since eveything else we're gearing towards is simple/lightweight?
David On 2/9/06, Zhong ZHENG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > pom updated to include log4j. > Thanks Patrick! > > > On 2/8/06, Patrick Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm still having the same problem. The log4j.jar is not included in > > pluto-portal.war per default - the pom doesn't reference log4j as > > dependency. The entry I added looks like this (copied from the > > testsuite): > > <dependency> > > <groupId>log4j</groupId> > > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> > > <version>1.2.9</version> > > <scope>runtime</scope> > > </dependency> > > > > After a mvn clean install; mvn pluto:install > > -DinstallDir=$CATALINA_HOME, log4j.jar is included in the war file. > > > > Would you mind doing a fresh svn co to check if you get this same > > error or not? So we'd know for sure if this is a local problem on my > > end or not. > > > > -- > > > > Update: I just tried another thing: delete pluto and testsuite from > > the webapp directory and that seemed to do the trick. Even though the > > tomcat install was fresh too, there must have been some leftovers from > > a previous attempt... > > > > Sorry for bothering you > > Patrick > > > > > > -- > > "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly > > by." -- Douglas Adams > > > > > -- > > ZHENG Zhong > - http://heavyz.blogspot.com/ > - http://people.apache.org/~zheng/ >
