No matter if it goes through the incubator or not, I'd like to make sure the pluto committers have an opportunity to review the code before it's committed. I was originally under the impression that the way this development was going to work was that instead of a code "grant" or dump, incremental modifications would take place in a branch - all starting from a clean 1.1 branch.

If this is not the way it will work, we just need to iron out the protocol - such as if the incubator is the right approach.

In terms of our contact with Torsten, I personally have had any discussions other than trying to connect with him. I think the ideal would be for him (and others on his team) to join the pluto-dev list and allow us to all contribute to the discussions. . .

Just my 2 cents. . .


David

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

see below
Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/24/2006 03:54:44 PM:

 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > IBM has contracted with a group at the University of Jena in Germany to
 > > help create the reference implementation of JSR-286 to be hosted at
> > Apache. David and I have been in contact with this group, which is headed > > by Torsten Dettborn, a member of the JSR-286 Expert Group. Torsten's group > > has done some work on the JSR-286 RI based on Pluto 1.1 that they want to
 > > contribute to our repository.
 > >
> > Unless anyone objects, I would like to create a Pluto 2.0 branch in SVN to > > house the JSR-286 Reference Implementation code. The starting point for
 > > this branch will be the Pluto 1.1 code now in our SVN trunk.
 > >
> > This is a great chance for the community to contribute to the JSR-286 RI > > and get an early look at an implementation of the developing JSR-286 spec.
 > I think every code donation must go through the incubator first, so we
 > should definitly first check with them.
 >

They are contributing code that builds on our current code base. I do not see why it has to go through the incubation process. Like Tomcat, which revs up a version for a new servlet/JSP spec, we are creating a new version that corresponds to the new portlet spec.
/Craig


 > Carsten
 > --
 > Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
 > http://www.s-und-n.de
 > http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Reply via email to