[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Neil Griffin deleted PLUTO-681:
-------------------------------


> TCK: Contesting PortletTests PortletConfig ApiRender 
> getContainerRuntimeOptions which assumes exactly 2 options will be returned
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PLUTO-681
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-681
>             Project: Pluto
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Vernon Singleton
>            Assignee: Scott Nicklous
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The following tests assume that exactly 2 options will be returned by the 
> getContainerRuntimeOptions method:
> V2PortletTests_PortletConfig_ApiRender_getContainerRuntimeOptions1:
> [https://github.com/apache/portals-pluto/blob/6f76532516a391233b21d8b192883db4333422d0/portlet-tck_3.0/V2PortletTests/src/main/java/javax/portlet/tck/portlets/PortletTests_PortletConfig_ApiRender.java#L342]
> V2PortletTests_PortletConfig_ApiRender_getContainerRuntimeOptions2:
> [https://github.com/apache/portals-pluto/blob/6f76532516a391233b21d8b192883db4333422d0/portlet-tck_3.0/V2PortletTests/src/main/java/javax/portlet/tck/portlets/PortletTests_PortletConfig_ApiRender.java#L370]
> V2PortletTests_PortletConfig_ApiRender_getContainerRuntimeOptions3:
> [https://github.com/apache/portals-pluto/blob/6f76532516a391233b21d8b192883db4333422d0/portlet-tck_3.0/V2PortletTests/src/main/java/javax/portlet/tck/portlets/PortletTests_PortletConfig_ApiRender.java#L397]
> Since this number, *2*, appears to magically fit pluto's return size, but is 
> unlikely to fit the return size of other containers, and since the tck only 
> checks one of the returned options, it might be better to relax this 
> requirement that portletConfig.getContainerRuntimeOptions().size() == 2.
> This could simply be changed to > 1 instead of == 2.
> Will send a PR in the comments with suggested fix for the tck.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to