I will *DEFINITELY* need more information about this. There should be no change in the number of shift/reduce conflicts between PLY 2.5 and PLY 3.0.
Cheers, Dave On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > Hi, > > Actually updating to ply 3.1 introduced 4 shift/reduce conflicts in my > grammar that I did not have in ply-2.5. Simple to fix but the > grammars should be equivalent, was there some change in v3.1 that > might have introduced these conflicts? > > The diff of the changes is attached, basically the I had to move > DECLARE keyword from the 3 different rules to the "parent" rule. > > Thanks, > -- > Nuno Lopes > > > > > > <grammar-ply31.diff> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
