Thanks for the link. I will look into it. Cheers, Dave
On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > Hi, > > > On 13 Mar 2009, at 18:43, David Beazley wrote: > >> I will *DEFINITELY* need more information about this. There should >> be no change in the number of shift/reduce conflicts between PLY 2.5 >> and PLY 3.0. > > The full code is available at sourceforge: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/xsparql > > The committed code gives no shift/reduces with ply-2.5 (just double > checked, no errors on parser.out) but introduces the 4 shift/reduce > with ply-3.1. > > Let me know if you need some more info. > > Thanks > -- > Nuno Lopes > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
