On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:51:43 +0100 Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon 05. Mar - 22:38:57, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This has come up before already, but without conclusion I think, so > > here goes... > > > > I think (and the FHS with me) that /etc is the wrong place for > > pm/functions and pm/hooks, etc. They are not supposed to be edited by the > > sysadmin. > > > > A better place would be /usr/lib IMHO, the FHS: > > > > /usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that > > are not intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts. > > > > Some people would say /usr/share: > > > > The /usr/share hierarchy is for all read-only architecture independent > > data files > > > > Apart from this, maybe we do want to allow the admin to install additional, > > custom hooks in /etc/pm/hooks. Should these be executed before, after or > > sorted in between the hooks form the packages, what do you think? > > Hm, the admin configures pm-utils below /etc/pm and puts additional hooks > into /usr/lib/pm/...? What would be wrong with that? Well /usr/lib is usually thought to be the domain of the package manager. In debian for example we only guarantee changes in /etc to be kept. grts Tim _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
