2007/3/9, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:37:13AM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
> On Tue 06. Mar - 00:21:56, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > The problem about the hooks is, that they are activated/deactivated
> > via the x-bit. It would be a bit odd to have to change the x bit of a
> > file in /usr/lib/pm.
> >
> > Maybe using symlinks would be a better idea anyway, similar to /etc/init.d
>
> I think this sounds reasonable. Something like a symlink from
> /etc/pm/hooks to /usr/lib/pm/hooks or the like?
no, more like:
/etc/pm/{hooks,sleep.d}/ having links
01foo -> /usr/lib/pm/hooks/foo
05bar -> /usr/lib/pm/hooks/bar
99baz -> /usr/lib/pm/hooks/baz
So you add a link -> enable the hook
rm the link -> disable the hook
It is even more intuitive than the "set the x bit to enable, remove it to
disable" IMO.
Completely agree.
My only complaint would be, /etc/pm/power.d/ and /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d/.
I'd rather call them functions.d.
power.d and sleep.d are just to similar to make it easy to guess what
their purpose is.
Cheers,
Michael
_______________________________________________
Pm-utils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
