On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:57:27PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:34:09 +0100 > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The reason why i did the S2DISK_BIN at all was that you can configure it to > > use s2both instead of s2disk. > > Since s2both needs similar preparation (select grub entry, check for swap, > > check the config file, etc.) as s2disk, it does not really make sense to > > replace s2ram with s2both, you can only replace s2disk with s2both. > > I don't agree. If I shutdown my laptop to put it in my backpack, I > want it to be in the lowest power state possible. So s2both can't be > used here.
I think you misunderstood me - i was arguing, why i implemented it this way, making $S2DISK_BIN configurable but not $S2RAM_BIN. I was _not_ saying that only one of s2disk or s2both is useful. But to get support for both, we need an additional "pm-safesupend" or something like that, with an associated method for calling it from HAL. My implementation just did not cover all that, and the $S2DISK_BIN variable was the "but i want to use s2both!"-bandaid. :-) -- Stefan Seyfried "Any ideas, John?" "Well, surrounding them's out." _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
