On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:45 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > It tells HAL to rescan the battery - in case someone changed the battery > we want the new serial number etc... if I recall Peter's reasoning > correctly. I think this check is better done in HAL than in pm-utils; it > doesn't make sense to make pm-utils call into HAL at all - Peter, is > this fine with you? > > If so, I'll make this change in HAL for 0.5.9 (and I'll make the async > too!).
Sure, this can (and should) be in HAL. I'll remove it just as soon as I can verify that the fixed HAL works. -- Peter _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
