On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 13:56 +0100, Olivier Blin wrote: > David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It tells HAL to rescan the battery - in case someone changed the battery > > we want the new serial number etc... if I recall Peter's reasoning > > correctly. I think this check is better done in HAL than in pm-utils; it > > doesn't make sense to make pm-utils call into HAL at all - Peter, is > > this fine with you? > > But what if pm-hibernate is run directly from command line and not > from hal-system-power-hibernate-linux ? > Or do you forget about command line users in pm-utils?
Yeah, that's certainly a valid point. I think that we really should be (as bizarre as it seems) telling HAL when we're suspending and when we're resuming. David, what do you think about this? -- Peter _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
