On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:54:16PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:51:52 +0200 > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OK, this will set --quirk-none to the exported quirks in case of a > > machine confirmed to be working without quirks. Please apply. > > OK, now we have this. We have to think how we want to use it. s2ram > always refused to suspend if a machine wasn't in the white list. Now we > have --quirks-none we can do the same in pm-utils. > > We can maybe teach hal to notice this and tell g-p-m that suspending > didn't succeed. g-p-m could then tell the user to go and find out what > quirks are needed. > > Do we agree about that?
yes, this sounds like a plan. And we can use --quirk-none to call s2ram with the "--force" option in pm-utils. -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
