On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:57:58 +0100 Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:54 +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:51:52 +0200 > > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OK, this will set --quirk-none to the exported quirks in case of a > > > machine confirmed to be working without quirks. Please apply. > > > > OK, now we have this. We have to think how we want to use it. s2ram > > always refused to suspend if a machine wasn't in the white list. Now we > > have --quirks-none we can do the same in pm-utils. > > Well, I think refusing to suspend is a bit harsh, but I understand why. > > > We can maybe teach hal to notice this and tell g-p-m that suspending > > didn't succeed. g-p-m could then tell the user to go and find out what > > quirks are needed. > > In RHEL 5 g-pm we query HAL for the suspend failure, maybe we can review > this again for upstream? Sorry, I don't understand. What do you precisely do? grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
