Michael Biebl wrote: > You mean, by either creating an empty file or a file without execute > bits in /etc/pm/sleep.d which has the same name as the hook that > should be disabled. > > Imho this wasn't very intuitive and setting a config/environment > variable seems to be more common.
But it was fast and small. Small is beautiful ;-) And documented. > The only complaint I had, was that we basically have two ways now, how > to disable a hook. But that's about it. The guys who forked the project should have changed the name. Unfortunately they now have legacy APIs to obey ;-) -- Stefan Seyfried R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
