On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:55 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Michael Biebl wrote: > > > You mean, by either creating an empty file or a file without execute > > bits in /etc/pm/sleep.d which has the same name as the hook that > > should be disabled. > > > > Imho this wasn't very intuitive and setting a config/environment > > variable seems to be more common. > > But it was fast and small. Small is beautiful ;-) > And documented.
It still is and that method still works. The whole reason I introduced the new method was to make disabling a hook an action another hook could do without needing to worry about persistent state. > > The only complaint I had, was that we basically have two ways now, how > > to disable a hook. But that's about it. > > The guys who forked the project should have changed the name. Unfortunately > they now have legacy APIs to obey ;-) -- Victor Lowther Ubuntu Certified Professional _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
