On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:16:58AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Trivial patch attached to fix behaviour of dbus-send. Description and
> solution in patch. Please review.

I think the --print-reply was removed, since it would slow down suspending
considerably.

Couldn't we - at least for the suspend case - just put the dbus-send
into the background? NM should be set to offline by g-p-m or kpowersave
already anyway before pm-utils come into play, shouldn't it?
-- 
Stefan Seyfried
R&D Team Mobile Devices            |              "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." 

This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers:
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
_______________________________________________
Pm-utils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils

Reply via email to