On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 15:41 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:16:58AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > Trivial patch attached to fix behaviour of dbus-send. Description and > > solution in patch. Please review. > > I think the --print-reply was removed, since it would slow down suspending > considerably. > > Couldn't we - at least for the suspend case - just put the dbus-send > into the background? NM should be set to offline by g-p-m or kpowersave > already anyway before pm-utils come into play, shouldn't it?
g-p-m appears to have done so for the last 3 years. Does network manager have a d-bus method that we can use to query its current state? If so, might be better to see if network manager is already asleep, and do nothing on suspend/resume if that is the case. Also, email referenced in the patch was from last March -- has d-bus been fixed since then? -- Victor Lowther Ubuntu Certified Professional _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
