On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 13:03 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Victor Lowther > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Nov 29, 2008, at 2:32 PM, "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Well, I'll try sending a mail to alsa-devel and see if anything happens. > >> > >> Ok, but the alsa hook is pretty fast, so it is lower on my list of > >> priorities. > > > > Yeah, it's not a big deal. At least, I think it should only be run if > > requested. Like NEED_SOUND_RESTORE or something. I'm sure it got > > blocked from getting back to this list, but here's Takashi's reply > > about needing the hook: > > > > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-November/013030.html > > According to Takashi, I think we can drop the alsactl hook. > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pm-utils/2008-November/001808.html > > For power management aware drivers, they will save and restore their > state for suspend. For non-power management aware drivers, they have > to be unloaded at suspend time. In that case, the system should be > setup to save and restore the state via udev or modprobe. I don't > think we should handle that case besides supporting SUSPEND_MODULES.
65alsa dropped per the above thread on alsa-devel, since it is never the right thing to do by itself. > > -- > Dan -- Victor Lowther RHCE# 805008539634727 LPIC-2# LPI000140019 _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
