Hi Paolo,

A nice addition to this change might be to reflect this in the logging as well. As far as I can see, the logging still uses the hardcoded "default" everywhere.

Regards,
Ruben

On 2013-07-06 14:45, Paolo Lucente wrote:
Hi Brian, Ruben,

This is now available in the CVS via a new set of configuration
directives [nf|pm|sf|u]acctd_proc_name. Log of the commit here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/pmacct-commits@pmacct.net/msg00771.html

Thanks once more to Brian for bringing this up.

Cheers,
Paolo

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:38:15PM +0000, Paolo Lucente wrote:
Hi Brian, Ruben,

It's a good proposal, it makes sense. Will introduce a config
directive to allow to customize the core process name default
being, for backward compatibility, "default". If you have any
different ideas please let me know. Otherwise will give you a
shout here once this is available in the CVS, estimate by (or
during) the coming weekend.

Cheers,
Paolo

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:06:42AM +0200, Ruben Laban wrote:
> On 7/2/2013 11:13 PM, Brian Rak wrote:
> >Is there a configuration option that will let me change the '[default]' > >bit in 'nfacctd: Core Process [default]'? I didn't see anything obvious
> >looking through http://wiki.pmacct.net/OfficialConfigKeys
> >
> >I have several different pmacct processes running, and it's tricky to > >keep track of which one is which (I end up having to look at the plugin
> >PIDs).
>
> Last I checked (been a while) this was hard-coded all over the
> place. Making it configurable surely would get my vote as well.
>
> Regards,
> Ruben Laban
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to