Hi Armin,
since you have mentioned that you want to publish future plans
shortly, I thought this could be the right time to join into the
discussion. Since our clients want to have enhancments of the
already existing applications our main issues are right now:
1 Enable p.mapper to use different config.ini to have more than one
p.mapper application at once
2 Authentification (which seems to be done by Dennis-Jan, so we
probably could drop this issue)
3 Make map.phtml more flexible to allow rearranging of the
page. We already started by allowing different sizes of the map
BTW: forgot to mention this in my last mail but of course
we would like to contribute this as well if you are interested.
4 Enhance p.mapper to be a full WMS-client supporting Web Map
Context, adding of user defined WMS-layer etc. (seems to be
already on your list)
What do you think? Are those ideas confirming with yours?
Many greetings,
Silke
--
Silke Reimer : www.intevation.de/~silke | GISpatcher: www.gispatcher.de
Intevation GmbH: www.intevation.de | Thuban : thuban.intevation.org
Georgstr.4 : 49074 Osnabr?ck | FreeGIS : www.freegis.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://faunalia.it/pipermail/pmapper-users/attachments/20060123/275a33b5/attachment.pgp
