Hi, I have recently read a mailing list post about p.mapper and geowebcache. As I have understood, there is no or little gain of using p.mapper and some tile caching mechanisms, mostly because p.mapper "oes not request tiles but always completely new images, at virtually indefinite scale levels" .
Now, I have a set of ortophoto images. They are sometimes rendered pretty slow even I've done all the stuff like pyramids, tiling, gdalindexing and so. I am wondering if it is worth trying a solution like MapProxy. As I can see, MapProxy works with ANY WMS client, it can merge tiles and transform/scale image if no matching cached resolution found, which seems suited for free zooming of p.mapper. Does anyone have some experience on this? Any suggestion/advice if this is worth trying at all? regards, dejan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ pmapper-users mailing list pmapper-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmapper-users
