At 12:46 PM 10/14/2006 +0900, Lars Eggert wrote:
On Oct 11, 2006, at 5:57, Michael Tuexen wrote:
Section 5., paragraph 3:
> The reference to sctp-parameters [3] should be removed
from the
> "Normative References" section after the IANA section has
been
> removed.
Why would the IANA section be removed?
This section is written like the one for SCTP-AUTH which was
suggested by
James. I thought, that the IANA section gets deleted when IANA has
done
its job. Isn't that right? James?
The IANA section customarily gets removed when all it has is "this
document requires no IANA actions", purely to increase readability.
Documents that require IANA actions do keep the section when published.
The same is true for SCTP-AUTH. I hadn't realized that has the same
problem and I didn't see an email on the list about this, but the
IANA section must remain in place there, too.
SCTP-AUTH has a large and well written IANA section, and is not void of
doing anything, so I'm confused by comparing what happens to Padding with
what happens to AUTH. Lars, can you explain your comments some more?
Lars
--
Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud
