Hi James,
it seems that you both think that the IANA section will stay. So the
reference to the link should stay. I can make it an Informative
Reference.
OK?
Best regards
Michael
On Oct 14, 2006, at 7:21 AM, James M. Polk wrote:
At 02:06 PM 10/14/2006 +0900, Lars Eggert wrote:
On Oct 14, 2006, at 14:03, James M. Polk wrote:
SCTP-AUTH has a large and well written IANA section, and is not
void of doing anything, so I'm confused by comparing what happens
to Padding with what happens to AUTH. Lars, can you explain your
comments some more?
SCTP-AUTH currently says:
NOTE to RFC-Editor:
"RFCXXXX" is to be replaced by the RFC number you assign this
document.
The reference to sctp-parameters [7] should be removed from the
"Normative References" section after the IANA section has been
removed.
The IANA section should NOT be removed here either.
I read the above as stating the reference (#7 in the references
section) should be removed, not the IANA section, which is how I'm
reading what you are implying you think the doc is asking to do.
Lars
--
Lars Eggert NEC Network
Laboratories
_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud
